How to measure the importance of a misstatement or omission for the purpose of determining whether it satisfies the materiality element of a 10b-5 claim.

Contributed in 2008 by David Gold
You're at a topic . To narrow down, use the menu box on the right.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
A presumption of reliance, if it applies, negates individual reliance issues in the predominance inquiry of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure...
vouch for authority for rule...
Accompanying cautionary language may negate the materiality of misstatements in projections, forecasts, or predictions.
complete authority for rule...
A defendant can be held liable for an omission in a Rule 10b-5 claim if, and only if, the defendant had a duty to disclose.