A person's character, or propensity, is inadmissible to show that person's conduct on a specific occasion.

Cf. United States v. Mangine, 302 F.3d 819, 822 (8th Cir. 2002) (upholding trial court's admission into evidence of testimony of a sheriff's lieutenant about defendant's statements made during plea negotiations because....Federal Rule of Evidence 410 or a comparable State rule bars the use of plea offers, plea negotiations, withdrawn pleas, and pleas of nolo contendere (no contest pleas) against the defendant who engaged in such plea negotiations, entered such a withdrawn plea, or entered such a plea of nolo contendere.

United States v. Reyes, 362 F.3d 536, 540 (8th Cir. 2004) (upholding trial court's admission of a co-conspirator's statements as recounted by an agent which did not violate defendant's Confrontation Clause rights....The right of confrontation guaranteed by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution puts no constraints on the admissibility of nontestimonial hearsay statements; the federal constitutional right of confrontation does not apply to such statements.

King v. Harrington, 447 F.3d 531, 533 (7th Cir. 2006) (holding, in plaintiff injured parties' personal injury action against defendant pick-up truck driver that evidence of defendant's liability insurance was....Evidence of the existence or non-existence of liability insurance is not admissible on the issue of negligence or wrongful conduct.