During the cross-examination of a witness -- and during any examination of a witness who is a permissible target for impeachment -- the witness may be asked about specific acts that are indicative of the witness's untruthfulness if such acts are relevant to and probative of the witness' truthfulness or untruthfulness, unless the trial court determines that the acts inquired into are unduly prejudicial.

Contributed in 2008 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
A statement that exposes a declarant (other than the defendant) to criminal liability is admissible under the hearsay exception for statements...
vouch for authority for rule...
The hearsay exception for prior testimony applies in a criminal trial or proceeding only if the prior testimony was given against the person who is...
vouch for authority for rule...
Evidence of a criminal or wrongful act apart from the act that at issue at trial Is not barred by the prohibition against circumstantial use of...