The rule barring the use of liability insurance or its absence on the issue of negligence or wrongful conduct does not bar such evidence about liability insurance if such evidence is offered on an issue other than negligence or wrongful conduct.

Cf. United States v. Gwathney, 465 F.3d 1133, 1140-1142 (10th Cir. 2006) (holding that the trial court erroneously admitted Western Union's response to the DEA's subpoena as a business record exception because the proper foundation....There is a hearsay exception for a memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a regularly conducted activity of a business, institution, association, profession, occupation, or calling if it was the regular practice of that business, institution, association, profession, occupation, or calling to make the memorandum, report, record or data compilation, unless the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness.

Cf. United States v. Mitchell, 145 F.3d 572, 576-577 (3d Cir. 1998) (vacating judgment of conviction for conspiracy to commit and commission of Hobbs Act robbery, and use of and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence....Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) or a comparable State rule creates a hearsay exception for an utterance that relates to a startling event or condition and is made while the declarant -- the maker of the statement -- is excited as a result of the starling event or condition.

Kudaback v. Kroger Co., 338 F.3d 856, pin? (8th Cir. 2003).Chiropractic is sufficiently reliable and scientific to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or comparable State rules for the admissibility of expert evidence.