A subsequent remedial measure is not admissible to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a defect in the product or its design, or a need for warning or instruction.

Contributed in May 2009 by Joannes Vinarao-Pilapil
Last edited in May by Peter Tillers
Viewing all 9 authorities
You've come to a general rule , a rule with exceptions. Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Evidence of a person's other sexual misconduct is frequently admissible in sexual assault cases, child molestation cases, and in civil cases...
vouch for authority for rule...
Evidence of a criminal or wrongful act apart from the act that at issue at trial Is not barred by the prohibition against circumstantial use of...
vouch for authority for rule...
Federal Rule of Evidence 413(d) provides that for purposes of Rule 413 and also for purposes of Federal Rule of Evidence 415 an "offense of sexual...