Although settlement negotiations and offers are inadmissible (i) to show the validity or invalidity of a claim when validity is in dispute, (ii) to show the amount of damages when the amount is in dispute, or (iii) to impeach by showing a prior inconsistent statement or specific contradiction, settlements, settlement offers, and settlement negotiations are admissible if they are offered for other purposes.

Contributed in 2009 by Joannes Vinarao-Pilapil
Last edited in 2010 by Peter Tillers
You've come to an exception to a general rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Settlement offers and statements made during settlement negotiations are inadmissible if such offers and statements are offered to (i) show the...
vouch for authority for rule...
A course of conduct can constitute habit for purposes of Federal Rule of Evidence 406 and state counterparts to Rule 406 only if the conduct is...
vouch for authority for rule...
The right of confrontation guaranteed by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution puts no constraints on the...