Payment of medical, hospital, or similar expenses occasioned by an injury.

Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 114-115 (1934) (neither defendant nor defendant's counsel was not allowed to be present when jury viewed crime scene; question was whether this was a denial of due process; held, it was not; Justice Cardozo for the Court: "A fertile source of...maybe

Fed. R. Evid. 413(b) ("In a case in which the Government intends to offer evidence under this rule, the attorney for the Government shall disclose the evidence to the defendant, including statements of witnesses or a summary of the substance of any testimony that is expected to be offered, at least fifteen days before the scheduled date of...In a case in which the prosecutor intends to offer evidence of similar sexual assaults under Federal Rule of Evidence 413, the prosecutor must disclose the evidence of such assaults to the defendant, including statements of witnesses or a summary of the substance of any testimony that is expected to be offered, at least fifteen days before the scheduled date of trial unless the trial court for good cause allows disclosure at a later time.

Santa Barbara Capital Mgmt. v. Neilson (In re Slatkin), 525 F.3d 805, 812-813 (9th Cir. 2008) (holding, in plaintiff trustee's adversary proceeding against defendant investors, that the bankruptcy court properly admitted the debtor's plea agreement....A statement not specifically covered by Federal Rule of Evidence 803 or 804 or by comparable State rules, but having equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness, is not excluded by the hearsay rule, if the court determines that (A) the statement is offered as evidence of a material fact; (B) the statement is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and (C) the general purposes of these rules and the interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence.