Although Federal Rule of Evidence 409 or a comparable State rule bars using evidence of paying for or furnishing medical, hospital, or similar expenses if such evidence is offered to prove liability, such evidence is admissible to show that the instrumentality causing an accident was under the control and responsibility of the defendant.

Contributed in 2009 by Joannes Vinarao-Pilapil
Last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule without authorities. Be the first to add one!

Why can't you narrow things down further? You may be finished with this point — you can go back to branch out — or this rule might need to grow.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Evidence of the existence or non-existence of liability insurance is not admissible on the issue of negligence or wrongful conduct.
complete authority for rule...
The government can have the burden of proof on factual issues other than the essential elements of the crime charged and the government's burden of...
vouch for authority for rule...
If behavior is largely volitional rather than semi-volitional or semi-automatic, it is hot habit.