VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
137341:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
The relationship between presumptions and the reasonable doubt standard
Add Comment
Contributed in 2009 by Peter Tillers
Browse from Adequate or inadequate?
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The admissibility of habit does not depend on the presence or absence of eyewitnesses.Fed. R. Evid. 406 ("regardless of the presence of eyewitnesses").
in support of
The admissibility of habit does not depend on the presence or absence of eyewitnesses.vouch for authority for rule...
noUnited States v. Feliz, 467 F.3d 227, 236-237 (2d Cir. 2006) (upholding trial court's admission of the autopsy reports because (1) "the autopsy reports [were] business records as defined in FED. R. EVID.....
in support of
novouch for authority for rule...
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(16) and comparable State rules create a hearsay exception for statements in an authenticated document that is more...Columbus-America Discovery Group, Inc. v. Unidentified, Wrecked And Abandoned Sailing Vessel, 742 F. Supp. 1327, 1343 (E.D. Va. 1990) (holding, in plaintiff search group's admiralty action against defendant salvage company, that "[e]ven if there be restrictions on the use of newspaper....
in support of
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(16) and comparable State rules create a hearsay exception for statements in an authenticated document that is more than a certain number of years old, typically twenty years.