Browse from 
VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
137404:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
Argumentative questions are not permitted.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
Law
»
Courts
»
Evidence
»
The nature of proof
»
Proof as temporal process
»
Proof at trial has a temporal dimension
»
Proof procedure at trial
»
General structure
»
Witness interrogation
»
Form of interrogation
»
Abusive questions prohibited
»
Argumentative questions: Argumentative questions...
You've hit the end
Contribution Suggestions
complete authority for rule...
Mental impairment because of drugs or drug addiction is rarely sufficient ground for a trial court to rule that a person is not qualified, or...United States v. Blankenship, 923 F.2d 1110, pin? (5th Cir. 1991) (held, despite evidence that the witness was a drug addict, even though witness occasionally hallucinated, trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to declare a person to be an incompetent witness,...
in support of
Mental impairment because of drugs or drug addiction is rarely sufficient ground for a trial court to rule that a person is not qualified, or competent, to serve as a witness.vouch for authority for rule...
A person's character, or propensity, is inadmissible to show that person's conduct on a specific occasion.United States v. Brown, 327 F.3d 867, 872 (9th Cir. 2003) (reversing conviction for wire fraud because district judge failed to give appropriate curative instructions after prosecutor, in closing argument, seeking to show defendant's criminal propensity, referred to evidence of defendant's other...
in support of
A person's character, or propensity, is inadmissible to show that person's conduct on a specific occasion.vouch for authority for rule...
A criminal defendant may offer a pertinent trait of his or her character circumstantially -- to show the defendant's doing or non-doing of a...Fed. R. Evid. 404(a)(1) ("In a criminal case, evidence of a pertinent trait of character offered by an accused" is admissible.).
in support of
A criminal defendant may offer a pertinent trait of his or her character circumstantially -- to show the defendant's doing or non-doing of a specific act.