137411:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

When considering whether some putatively scientific or expert evidence is sufficiently reliable to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or a comparable State rule for the admissibility of scientific or expert evidence, the trial court may consider whether the expert or scientific evidence, principle, or method was developed by a party or its agent in anticipation of litigation.
Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule
. Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Why can't you narrow this down further? You may be finished with this point — you can go back to branch out — or this rule might need to grow.
Be a contributor: - Vouch for this authority if you've read it and agree that it supports this rule. Hover over it and click "vouch."
- Edit to correct an error in an authority. Hover and click "edit."
- Add another authority to this rule by clicking "contribute new authority."
- Comment by clicking "add comment" just below the authority.
Your name will appear, linked to your Spindle profile page.