Sign In Sign Up Contact

Search

BROWSE SEARCH SPINDOC HELP

Browse from Privilege protects confidential communications made to get or provide legal services

view tree to see hierarchy and quickly navigate

view icon key

Law »

Courts »

Civil Procedure »

(Typically) pre-discovery issues »

Jurisdiction & venue »

Venue »

Transfer »

To foreign courts »

Forum non conveniens »

Procedure »

Multiple factor test »

The individual factors »

Adequacy of alternate forum »

Adequate or inadequate? »

Individual factors: inadequate or adequate? »

Procedural legal obstacles »

Making forum inadequate »

Statute of limitations bars the litigation: If the statute of limitations...

137599:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:true:-1:-1

This branch is locked for editing.

Rule: a rule of law

If the statute of limitations in the alternate forum bars the litigation, the forum is considered inadequate for purposes of a forum non conveniens motion to dismiss.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Nicholas Diamand

All (1) Cases (1) Statutes, Regs, Rules (0)

1 case authority.

Sorted By Date Sort By Court

You've come to a rule

. Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...

Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.

Contribution Suggestions

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

The private interest factors to be weighed in the context of a forum non conveniens motion to dismiss include ease of access to evidence, ability...

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

In the context of a motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds, general fears of corruption in the alternate forum do not render it inadequate.

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

While deference should be afforded to a plaintiff's choice of home forum, that choice is not a dispositive issue.

view more suggestions