Sign In Sign Up Contact

Search

BROWSE SEARCH SPINDOC HELP

Browse from Federal privilege not applicable in federal civil actions to elements of claims defenses based on state law

view tree to see hierarchy and quickly navigate

view icon key

Law »

Courts »

Evidence »

Admissibility of evidence »

Collateral policy »

Privileges »

Nonconstitutional privileges »

Particular privileges »

Psychotherapist-patient privilege »

There is a psychotherapist-patient privilege »

Applicable in criminal actions?: Is the privilege for...

137673:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

Split: a topic about which there is a dispute

Is the privilege for confidential communications between therapists and clients applicable in criminal trials and proceedings?

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers

You've come to a split

, which means there's some disagreement about this topic. This split hasn't been developed yet. To continue your research, go back. And check back soon — more law is coming!

Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.

Contribution Suggestions

vouch for authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

Federal Rule of Evidence 803(13) creates a hearsay exception for statements of fact concerning personal or family history contained in family...

vouch for authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

A statement falls within the hearsay exception provided by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) only if the statement is related to a startling event or...

vouch for authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

A prior inconsistent statement of a witness is admissible, not only to impeach the witness, but also as substantive evidence -- to prove the truth...

view more suggestions