Evidence of a criminal or wrongful act apart from the act that at issue at trial Is not barred by the prohibition against circumstantial use of character if intent, knowledge, mistake, or accident is a legally-material factual issue, the opposing party suggests the non-existence of knowledge or urges mistake or accident as a defense, and evidence of another crime, wrong, or act is offered to prove the knowledge or the absence of mistake or accident by a criminal defendant or other person.

United States v. Masferrer, 514 F.3d 1158, 1162 (11th Cir. 2008) (upholding trial court's admission into evidence of the Bloomberg market quotes and financial information as market quotations under Rule 803(17) because "the....There is a hearsay exception for market quotations, directories, or similar published compilations that are generally used and relied upon either by the public or by members of particular occupations.

Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 114-115 (1934) (neither defendant nor defendant's counsel was not allowed to be present when jury viewed crime scene; question was whether this was a denial of due process; held, it was not; Justice Cardozo for the Court: "A fertile source of...There is no generally-accepted general definition of "evidence."

United States v. Dudley, 562 F.2d 965, 966 (5th Cir. 1977) (upholding trial court's ruling which allowed the introduction into evidence of accused's prior Dyer Act conviction because such evidence was necessary for proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan and knowledge, pursuant to Rule...A person's other crimes, wrongs, or acts are not barred by the character rule either if they are not offered to show that person's propensity or if they are not offered to show that that person engaged in conduct on a particular occasion because of his or her propensity to engage in that sort of conduct.