143606:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
The rule against evidence of subsequent remedial measures applies only to a remedial measure that was taken after the event that caused a harm or injury. The rule is inapplicable to a remedial measure that was taken after the alleged wrongdoer's defalcation but before any harm was done to the victim of the defalcation or wrong.
Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2010 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Why can't you narrow this down further? You may be finished with this point — you can go back to branch out — or this rule might need to grow.
Be a contributor: - Vouch for this authority if you've read it and agree that it supports this rule. Hover over it and click "vouch."
- Edit to correct an error in an authority. Hover and click "edit."
- Add another authority to this rule by clicking "contribute new authority."
- Comment by clicking "add comment" just below the authority.
Your name will appear, linked to your Spindle profile page.
Browse from "Subsequent remedial measure" = if done before harm-causing event, measure would have reduced chance of harm
You've hit the end
VIEW TREE
ICON KEY