Sign In Sign Up Contact

Search

BROWSE SEARCH SPINDOC HELP

Browse from Tangible things and many other matters must be authenticated

view tree to see hierarchy and quickly navigate

view icon key

Law »

Courts »

Evidence »

Admissibility of evidence »

Relevance rules »

Miscellaneous "relevance rules" »

Subsequent remedial measures »

Subsequent remedial measure inadmissible to show negligence or similar matters »

Does prohibition extend to remedial measures by non-parties?: Does the rule limiting...

143611:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

Split: a topic about which there is a dispute

Does the rule limiting the admissibility of subsequent remedial measures apply to remedial measures by non-parties?

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2010 by Peter Tillers

You've come to a split

, which means there's some disagreement about this topic. See the options in the menu box on the right.

Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.

Contribution Suggestions

vouch for authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) or a comparable State rule creates a hearsay exception for an utterance that relates to a startling event or...

vouch for authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

A statement by an agent or an employee can be imputed to the principal or the employer (respectively) and be treated as a vicarious admission...

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

The Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution grants a criminal defendant the right to introduce exculpatory...

view more suggestions