Whether expert evidence in accounting, bookkeeping, financial and investment services, and similar fields is sufficiently reliable to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or comparable State rules for the admissibility of expert evidence

Contributed in 2009 by Joannes Vinarao-Pilapil
Last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You're at a topic that hasn't been developed yet. To continue your research, go back and branch out. And check back soon — more law is coming!

Be a contributor: Any authority here should be moved to its rule, once that rule is on Spindle. If the rule is on Spindle, please move the authority by hovering over it and clicking "cut & paste." Your name will appear, linked to your Spindle profile page.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The hearsay exception for prior testimony applies in a criminal trial or proceeding only if the prior testimony was given against the person who is...
vouch for authority for rule...
The co-conspirator exemption from the hearsay rule applies only if the trial court concludes that a preponderance of of the evidence shows that the...
vouch for authority for rule...
To qualify as a statement of present sense impression for purposes of the hearsay exception by that name, the statement must be spontaneous.