Whether expert evidence based on or involving social psychology or sociology is sufficiently reliable to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or comparable State rules for the admissibility of expert evidence

Contributed in 2009 by Joannes Vinarao-Pilapil
Last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You're at a topic . To narrow down, use the menu box on the right.

Be a contributor: Any authority here should be moved to its rule, once that rule is on Spindle. If the rule is on Spindle, please move the authority by hovering over it and clicking "cut & paste." Your name will appear, linked to your Spindle profile page.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Relevant evidence is admissible unless another rule of evidence, law, or valid principle mandates or permits exclusion.
vouch for authority for rule...
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(4) or a comparable State rule creates a hearsay exception for a statement made for the purpose of medical diagnosis or...
vouch for authority for rule...
Evidence of another crime, wrong, or act is not barred by the prohibition against circumstantial use of character if such other crime, wrong, or...