Expert evidence based on or involving entymology is generally sufficiently reliable to be admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or comparable State rules.

United States v. Mercado Irizarry, 404 F.3d 497, 500 (1st Cir. 2005) (upholding trial court's admission of officer's testimony about co-defendant's prior consistent statement about the murder because "[co-defendant's] consistent....A prior statement of a witness is exempt from the prohibition against hearsay evidence if the prior statement is consistent with the witness' testimony at the trial or hearing at which the prior statement is offered, the prior statement is offered to rebut a express or implied charge of recent fabrication or motive, and the witness who made the prior statement testifies and is subject to cross-examination at the trial or hearing at which the prior statement is offered.

United States v. Robinson, 275 F.3d 371, 382-383 (4th Cir. 2001) (upholding trial court's admission of Longshore's testimony about the verbal description of the victim's murder as an adoptive admission because (1) "while....An adoptive admission is exempt from the prohibition against hearsay evidence.

United States v. Summers, 414 F.3d 1287, pin? (10th Cir. 2005) ("'Viewing the evidence in its entirety, a conviction must be grounded on more than a suspicion of guilt. United States v. Fox, 902 F.2d 1508, 1513 (10th Cir.....Although proof of criminal guilt can rest on chains of inferences, such pyramided inferences must be reasonable.