Is repressed and recovered memory evidence sufficiently reliable to satisfy the requirements for admissibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or comparable State rules?

Contributed in August 2009 & last edited in December 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a split , which means there's some disagreement about this topic. See the options in the menu box on the right.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The trial court may use Rule of Evidence 403 to exclude relevant evidence if the court finds that the probative value of the evidence is...
complete authority for rule...
Poverty is generally irrelevant to the question of the doing of an act (such as theft) by showing motive (such as desire for money) for the act.
vouch for authority for rule...
Hearsay evidence is inadmissible.