Is repressed and recovered memory evidence sufficiently reliable to satisfy the requirements for admissibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or comparable State rules?

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a split , which means there's some disagreement about this topic. See the options in the menu box on the right.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The co-conspirator exemption from the hearsay rule applies only if the trial court concludes that a preponderance of of the evidence shows that the...
complete authority for rule...
Evidence of a condition upon which the relevance of evidence depends is sufficient if a reasonable trier (such as a jury) can find by a...
vouch for authority for rule...
A trial court has the discretion to refuse to apply the doctrine if curative admissibility if it concludes the risk of prejudice from admitting...