The trial court may exclude relevant evidence if the probative value of evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.

Greycas, Inc. v. Proud, 826 F.2d 1560, 1567 (7th Cir. 1987) (holding, in plaintiff lender's negligent misrepresentation action against defendant attorney, that the trial court properly relied on the state court's....There is a hearsay exception for public records of documents affecting an interest in property.

Fed. R. Evid. 404(a)(2) (Prosecution's evidence of the pertinent trait of the character of the alleged victim is admissible if it is offered to rebut character evidence of the alleged....If accused offers victim's character to show victim's doing of an act, the prosecution may offer rebutting evidence of victim's character.

United States v. Kingston, 971 F.2d 481, 485-486 (10th Cir. 1992) (upholding trial court's admission of the testimony of the loan counselors on telephone conversations they had with the defendant and his wife regarding the....Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(6) and comparable State rules provide that a statement made by a person over the telephone may be authenticated (i) if the call was to a person, the call was to the number assigned to the person and circumstances, including self-identification, show or suggest that the person who spoke was the person who was called and (ii) if the call was to a business, the call was to the number assigned to that business and the conversation related to business reasonably transacted over the telephone.