VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
1480:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!199702!199701!:false:-1
Privilege for confidential communications between patients and "psychotherapists"
Add Comment
Contributed in 2008 & last edited in December 2009 by Peter Tillers
Browse from Prior inconsistent statements
Law
»
Courts
»
Evidence
»
Admissibility of evidence
»
Collateral policy
»
Privileges
»
Nonconstitutional privileges
»
Particular privileges
»
Psychotherapist-patient privilege: Privilege for confidential...
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Evidence that a witness has the personal knowledge that is required of a witness may be provided by the witness whose testimony is offered but...Fed. R. Evid. 602 ("Evidence to prove personal knowledge may, but need not, consist of the witness' own testimony.").
in support of
Evidence that a witness has the personal knowledge that is required of a witness may be provided by the witness whose testimony is offered but evidence of the witness's personal knowledge may also be provided by other witnesses or by other evidence.complete authority for rule...
Although proof of criminal guilt can rest on chains of inferences, such pyramided inferences must be reasonable.United States v. Valadez-Gallegos, 162 F.3d 1256, pin? (10th Cir. 1998) ("However, we may not uphold a conviction obtained by piling inference upon inference. United States v. Jones, 44 F.3d 860, 865 (10th Cir. 1995). 'An inference is reasonable only if the conclusion flows...
in support of
Although proof of criminal guilt can rest on chains of inferences, such pyramided inferences must be reasonable.complete authority for rule...
Courts have occasionally said that proof beyond a reasonable doubt is proof that leaves the trier with a firm and abiding conviction (belief) about...United States v. Barrera-Gonzalez, 950 F.2d 1269, 1273 (10th Cir. 1992) ("We agree with the government's assertion that the terms 'firmly convinced' requires more persuasion than terms such as 'reasonable certainty' or 'abiding conviction as to guilt.' Thus, we hold that the district court's 'reasonable...
in support of
Courts have occasionally said that proof beyond a reasonable doubt is proof that leaves the trier with a firm and abiding conviction (belief) about the fact in issue.