Browse from 
VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
1501:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
Courts effectively differ on the propriety of using other acts, wrongs, or crimes to show a criminal "pattern."
Add Comment
Contributed in 2008 by Peter Tillers
Law
»
Courts
»
Evidence
»
Admissibility of evidence
»
Relevance rules
»
Character
»
Other crimes, wrongs or acts
»
Admissible if not offered to show propensity or conduct
»
To show plan or scheme
»
Other wrong or crime to show pattern: Courts effectively differ...
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
complete authority for rule...
Evidence that helps tell a factual story in an intelligible way or that puts the evidence or the issues in the case in a meaningful or intelligible...Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, pin? (1997).
in support of
Evidence that helps tell a factual story in an intelligible way or that puts the evidence or the issues in the case in a meaningful or intelligible context is "relevant."vouch for authority for rule...
The hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 807 or a comparable State rule applies only if the the affected statement is evidence of...Santa Barbara Capital Mgmt. v. Neilson (In re Slatkin), 525 F.3d 805, 812-813 (9th Cir. 2008) (holding, in plaintiff trustee's adversary proceeding against defendant investors, that the bankruptcy court properly admitted the debtor's plea agreement....
in support of
The hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 807 or a comparable State rule applies only if the the affected statement is evidence of a material fact.complete authority for rule...
To be admissible, prior events or accidents must be substantially similar to those at issue in trial.Croskey v. BMW of North America, Inc., 532 F.3d 511, 518 (6th Cir. 2008).
in support of
To be admissible, prior events or accidents must be substantially similar to those at issue in trial.