The admissibility of a person's habit or an organization's routine practice does not depend on corroboration or on the presence or absence of eyewitnesses.

Cf. United States v. Pluta, 176 F.3d 43, 49-50 (2d Cir. 1999) (upholding trial court's admission into evidence of statements and of the Polish passports of the persons the defendant was accused of smuggling because "the....Some things or documents -- some things and documents with certain characteristics or appearances -- do not have to be authenticated: some things or documents are "self-authenticating."

United States v. Dumeisi, 424 F.3d 566, 576-577 (7th Cir. 2005) (upholding trial court's admission of the Baghdad File under the residual hearsay exception because the court "expressly considered the same circumstantial....A statement is admissible under the hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 807 or a comparable State rule only if circumstantial evidence shows that the affected statement is as trustworthy as the statements that are made admissible by the hearsay exceptions created by Federal Rules of Evidence 803 and 804 or by comparable State rules.

Fed. R. Evid. 803(23) ("Judgments as proof of matters of personal, family or general history, or boundaries, essential to the judgment, if the same would be provable by evidence of reputation.").There is a hearsay exception for judgments as proof of matters of personal, family or general history, or boundaries, essential to the judgment, if the same(?) would be provable by evidence of reputation.