Subsequent remedial measures, including physical repairs.

United States v. Lampton, 158 F.3d 251, 259 (5th Cir. 1998) (convictions for conspiracy to distribute quantities of heroin, marijuana, cocaine base, and cocaine hydrochloride; defendants asserted that the district court abused its discretion when it allowed an F.B.I. agent to give expert testimony as to...Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(5) and comparable State rules allow identification of a person's voice -- they allow identification of a speaker -- by a lay witness who has heard the purported speaker's voice on another occasion.

Cf. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Kilpatrick, 227 F.2d 240, 243 (5th Cir. 1955) (holding that the evidence of petitioner taxpayer's nolo contendere convictions of tax evasion was admissible for impeachment purposes because the "Tax Court....Federal Rule of Evidence 410 or a comparable State rule bars the use of a nolo contendere plea (no contest plea) as evidence in any proceeding against the defendant who entered this plea.

United States v. Avants, 367 F.3d 433, 444-445 (5th Cir. 2004) (upholding trial court's admission of the 1966 preliminary hearing testimony through Rule 804(b)(1) because the "[defendant] has not presented any reason why....The hearsay exception for prior testimony applies in a criminal case only if the if the party against whom the testimony is now offered had an opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony in the prior proceeding by direct, cross, or redirect examination. The exception applies in a civil action or proceeding only if the party against whom the testimony is now offered or a predecessor in interest had an opportunity and similar motive in the prior proceeding to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination.