VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
154372:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
This is a cross reference. Click here to make the jump.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2009 by Peter Tillers
Last edited in 2009 by Joel Friedman
Browse from Junk science
Law
»
Courts
»
Evidence
»
Admissibility of evidence
»
Expert and scientific evidence
»
Must expert evidence be generally acceptable to experts or must the trial court make an independent assessment of the validity and reliability of such evidence?
»
Trial court must act as gatekeeper and make independent assessment
»
The expert or scientific evidence must be shown to be reliable
»
Reliability or unreliability of assorted fields and methods
»
Reliability or unreliability of assorted other forms of expert or special knowledge or skill
»
Hypnosis: Cross-reference
You've hit the end
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
If a statement is offered against a criminal defendant, the statement qualifies as a statement against interest for purposes of the federal hearsay...United States v. Alvarez, 584 F.2d 694, 701 (5th Cir. 1978) (reversing conviction for heroin trafficking because the trial court erroneously admitted principal witness's in-court testimony of the out-of-court statements....
in support of
If a statement is offered against a criminal defendant, the statement qualifies as a statement against interest for purposes of the federal hearsay exception for statements against interest only if there is corroborating evidence of the trustworthiness of the statement. vouch for authority for rule...
A prior statement is exempt from the federal hearsay rule and is admissible to prove the truth of the matter asserted by the declarant with the...United States v. Mornan, 413 F.3d 372, 379 (3d Cir. 2005) (upholding trial court's admission of Burton's September 2001 statement as a prior inconsistent statement because Burton's "purported lack of memory was not....
in support of
A prior statement is exempt from the federal hearsay rule and is admissible to prove the truth of the matter asserted by the declarant with the prior statement if the prior statement was made under oath in another proceeding and if the prior statement is inconsistent with the declararant's testimony or with the admitted hearsay statement of the declarant.
vouch for authority for rule...
A statement by a co-conspirator of a party is not barred by the hearsay rule from being admitted against the party if the statement was made by the...United States v. Russo, 302 F.3d 37, 46 (2d Cir. 2002) (upholding trial court's admission into evidence of Parlagreco's testimony about the declarations by non-defendant members of the Colombo family as....
in support of
A statement by a co-conspirator of a party is not barred by the hearsay rule from being admitted against the party if the statement was made by the co-conspirator during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.