Sign In Sign Up Contact

Search

BROWSE SEARCH SPINDOC HELP

Browse from Inference on inference permissible?

view tree to see hierarchy and quickly navigate

view icon key

Law »

Courts »

Civil Procedure »

(Typically) pre-discovery issues »

Jurisdiction & venue »

Venue »

Transfer »

To foreign courts »

Forum non conveniens »

Procedure »

Multiple factor test »

The individual factors »

Adequacy of alternate forum »

Adequate or inadequate? »

Individual factors: inadequate or adequate? »

Procedural legal obstacles »

Making forum adequate »

Specific obstacles »

Lack of or limited class actions »

Stricter standards for class claims: In the context of a motion...

154489:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

Rule: a rule of law

In the context of a motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds, the fact that there may be stricter class action standards in the alternate forum does not render that forum inadequate.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2010 by Nicholas Diamand

All (1) Cases (1) Statutes, Regs, Rules (0)

1 case authority.

Sorted By Date Sort By Court

You've come to a rule

. Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...

Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.

Contribution Suggestions

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

The court has no discretion to grant a forum non conveniens motion if there is no adequate alternate forum available.

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

The party moving for forum non conveniens dismissal must demonstrate (1) the existence of an adequate alternative forum and (2) that the balance of...

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

The forum non conveniens doctrine's foreign policy implications support application of federal law.

view more suggestions