Sign In Sign Up Contact

Search

BROWSE SEARCH SPINDOC HELP

Browse from Yes

view tree to see hierarchy and quickly navigate

view icon key

Law »

Courts »

Civil Procedure »

(Typically) pre-discovery issues »

Jurisdiction & venue »

Venue »

Transfer »

To foreign courts »

Forum non conveniens »

Procedure »

Multiple factor test »

The individual factors »

Adequacy of alternate forum »

Adequate or inadequate? »

All Δs remain in litigation: Whether all defendants...

154565:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

Split: a topic about which there is a dispute

Whether all defendants need to remain in the litigation in order for the alternate forum to be considered adequate.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2010 by Nicholas Diamand

You've come to a split

, which means there's some disagreement about this topic. See the options in the menu box on the right.

Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.

Contribution Suggestions

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

In the context of a motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds, the court may condition dismissal on the defendant agreeing to submit to the...

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

The common law doctrine of forum non conveniens provides that a court may decline to exercise its jurisdiction, even though the court has...

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

A conditional dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds is not a substitute for a full analysis of an alternate forum's adequacy.

view more suggestions