Sign In Sign Up Contact

Search

BROWSE SEARCH SPINDOC HELP

Browse from All Δs remain in litigation

view tree to see hierarchy and quickly navigate

view icon key

Law »

Courts »

Civil Procedure »

(Typically) pre-discovery issues »

Jurisdiction & venue »

Venue »

Transfer »

To foreign courts »

Forum non conveniens »

Procedure »

Multiple factor test »

The individual factors »

Adequacy of alternate forum »

Adequate or inadequate? »

All Δs remain in litigation »

Yes: In the context of a motion...

154566:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

Rule: a rule of law

In the context of a motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds, an alternate forum will not be adequate if not all the defendants will remain in the litigation if the case is transferred there.

Contributed in 2009 by Nicholas Diamand

All (3) Cases (3) Statutes, Regs, Rules (0)

3 case authorities.

Sorted By Date Sort By Court

You've come to a rule

. Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...

Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.

Contribution Suggestions

vouch for authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

Because forum non conveniens motions address rules of venue, not of decision, the Erie Doctrine does not require the application of state forum non...

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

In the context of a forum non conveniens motion to dismiss, the absence of a contingency fee system in the alternate forum does not render it...

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

The public interest factors to be weighed in the context of a forum non conveniens motion to dismiss include court congestion, local interest in...

view more suggestions