154587:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

The defendant's failure to disclose his manipulative acts do not support a presumption of reliance.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2010 by David Gold
Law
»
Commerce, labor, particular activities & industries
»
Securities
»
Liability & enforcement
»
Fraud claims
»
SEC Rule 10b-5
»
Substance
»
Liability
»
Primary
»
Types of claims (by types of wrongs)
»
Deceptive conduct claims (Rule 10b-5(a) & (c))
»
Manipulation
»
Elements
»
Reliance presumptions
»
Concealment of manipulation doesn't support omission-based presumption: The defendant's failure...

Markets that are efficient for purposes of establishing the fraud-on-the-market presumption are not rare.
A statement about the future is actionable under Rule 10b-5 only if it was false when stated.
Where a plaintiff brings different claims for relief against different defendants in a single action, venue must be proper as to each claim for...