154587:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

The defendant's failure to disclose his manipulative acts do not support a presumption of reliance.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2010 by David Gold
Law
»
Commerce, labor, particular activities & industries
»
Securities
»
Liability & enforcement
»
Fraud claims
»
SEC Rule 10b-5
»
Substance
»
Liability
»
Primary
»
Types of claims (by types of wrongs)
»
Deceptive conduct claims (Rule 10b-5(a) & (c))
»
Manipulation
»
Elements
»
Reliance presumptions
»
Concealment of manipulation doesn't support omission-based presumption: The defendant's failure...

Losses from sales of securities to U.S. citizens residing abroad give rise to federal subject matter jurisdiction over a Rule 10b-5 claim arising...
In a Rule 10b-5 action, the discovery period begins to run only when the plaintiff has actual notice of the alleged fraud.
A misstatement or omission as to merger negotiations that are preliminary, contingent, and speculative, are not enough to satisfy the materiality...