Whether a plaintiff can establish a presumption of reliance on the basis of an integrity-of-the-market theory analogous to the fraud-on-the-market presumption theory available in misstatement and omission claims.

Contributed in 2009 by David Gold
You've come to a split , which means there's some disagreement about this topic. See the options in the menu box on the right.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
complete authority for rule...
A defendant can be held liable for an omission in a Rule 10b-5 claim if, and only if, the defendant had a duty to disclose.
vouch for authority for rule...
A party other than the United States has standing to bring a Rule 10b-5 claim only if the party was a purchaser or seller in the transaction giving...
complete authority for rule...
Whether a misstatement or omission as to the existence of merger negotiations is material for purposes of a Rule 10b-5 claim depends on the stage...