It is not an abuse of discretion for a district court to determine than a plaintiff can not establish a presumption of reliance on the basis of an integrity-of-the-market theory analogous to the fraud-on-the-market presumption theory available in misstatement and omission claims.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by David Gold
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The requirement of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that, as to each allegation of a misstatement or omission that is based on...
complete authority for rule...
Whether allegations that a speaker's opinion was subjectively false are sufficient to satisfy the pleading requirements of the Private Securities...
vouch for authority for rule...
Congress's creation of an alternate, statutory form of vicarious liability under Section 20(a) does not preclude agency liability theories under...