If another crime, wrong, of act is to be admissible, (i) must the evidence of such a crime, wrong, or act be sufficient to allow a reasonable person or juror to find that the crime, wrong, or act occurred, (ii) must the evidence establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the crime, wrong, or act occurred, (iii) must there be clear and convincing evidence of the crime, wrong, or act, or (iv) must the other crime, wrong, or act be shown beyond a reasonable doubt?

United States v. Masferrer, 514 F.3d 1158, 1162 (11th Cir. 2008) (upholding trial court's admission into evidence of the Bloomberg market quotes and financial information as market quotations under Rule 803(17) because "the....There is a hearsay exception for market quotations, directories, or similar published compilations that are generally used and relied upon either by the public or by members of particular occupations.

Pinkham v. Burgess, 933 F.2d 1066, 1071-1072 (1st Cir. 1991) (holding, in plaintiff's action against defendant attorney for negligent representation that evidence consisting of plaintiff's testimony about the extent of....The rule limiting the admissibility evidence about liability insurance applies both to evidence showing the absence of liability insurance and to evidence showing the existence of liability insurance.

United States v. Udeozor, 515 F.3d 260, 267-268 (4th Cir. 2008) (upholding trial court's admission of two police recorded telephone conversations [between the victim and defendant's husband] as statements against penal....A statement qualifies as a statement against interest for purposes of the hearsay exception for statements against interest only if the statement, at the time the declarant made it, was so contrary to the declarant's interest that a reasonable person in the declarant's position would not have made if the declarant had believed the statement to be untrue.