If another crime, wrong, of act is to be admissible, (i) must the evidence of such a crime, wrong, or act be sufficient to allow a reasonable person or juror to find that the crime, wrong, or act occurred, (ii) must the evidence establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the crime, wrong, or act occurred, (iii) must there be clear and convincing evidence of the crime, wrong, or act, or (iv) must the other crime, wrong, or act be shown beyond a reasonable doubt?

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2010 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a split , which means there's some disagreement about this topic. See the options in the menu box on the right.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The right of confrontation guaranteed by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution puts no constraints on the...
vouch for authority for rule...
The prohibition, grounded in the Compulsory Process Clause, against deliberate government action that deprives a criminal defendant of the relevant...
vouch for authority for rule...
Another crime may be used "circumstantially" -- for a purpose other than witness impeachment -- and for an otherwise permissible non-propensity...