Choice of law and conflicts of law principles applicable to privileges

United States v. Munoz-Franco, 487 F.3d 25, 38-39 (1st Cir. 2007) (upholding trial court's admission of the Board and Executive Committee meeting minutes as business records because its trustworthiness was established as "the....Document must have been prepared in the normal course of business.

United States v. Cianci, 378 F.3d 71, 101 (1st Cir. 2004) (upholding trial court's admission of Pannone's taped statements as co-conspirator's statements because they "were not made 'after the fact,' but were uttered....A statement falls within the hearsay exemption for statements of co-conspirators only if the statement was made in furtherance of the conspiracy.

United States v. Abel, 469 U.S. 45, pin? (1984) ("It seems clear to us that the proffered testimony with respect to Mills' membership in the Aryan Brotherhood sufficed to show potential bias in favor of respondent; because of the tenets of the organization described, it might...The principle of multiple admissibility: if evidence is inadmissible for one purpose, it may be admissible for another purpose; if evidence is inadmissible to show one fact, the evidence, if relevant to another fact, may be admissible to show the other fact.