Sign In Sign Up Contact

Search

BROWSE SEARCH SPINDOC HELP

Browse from Criminal defendant has a constitutional right to testify if...

view tree to see hierarchy and quickly navigate

view icon key

Law »

Courts »

Evidence »

Admissibility of evidence »

Witness competence & credibility »

Witness competence »

Witness competence rules may not abridge constitutional rights »

Criminal defendant has a constitutional right to testify if... »

Testimony of previously-hypnotized criminal defendant: A per se rule barring...

1605:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!143619!154375!:false:-1:-1

Rule: a rule of law

A per se rule barring a criminal defendant from testifying about a matter about which he or she was previously hypnotized is unconstitutional.

Contributed in 2008 by Peter Tillers

All (2) Cases (2) Statutes, Regs, Rules (0)

2 case authorities.

Sorted By Date Sort By Court

You've come to a rule

. Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...

Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.

Contribution Suggestions

complete authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

Extrinsic evidence may be used to to impeach a witness by showing the bias or interest of the witness; i.e., the party seeking to impeach a witness...

vouch for authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

The co-conspirator exemption from the hearsay rule applies only if the trial court concludes that a preponderance of of the evidence shows that the...

vouch for authority for rule...

General Rule: a rule with an exception(s)

A person's character, or propensity, is inadmissible to show that person's conduct on a specific occasion.

view more suggestions