Neither religious belief nor the absence of religious belief is admissible to rehabilitate a witness.

Cf. United States v. Hamilton, 413 F.3d 1138, 1142-1143 (10th Cir. 2005) (upholding trial court's ruling that the computer-generated header information did not constitute hearsay evidence because "the header information was....A "statement" for purposes of the hearsay prohibition against the admission of hearsay statements is (1) an oral or written assertion or (2) nonverbal conduct of a person, if it is intended by the person as an assertion.

Cleveland v. KFC National Management Co., 948 F. Supp. 62, 65 (N.D. Ga. 1996) (holding, in employee's action against employer for sexual harassment, that evidence of employer's past sexual misconduct was probative as it corroborated plaintiff's story ).Federal Rule of Evidence 415 and comparable rules in some states create an exception to the prohibition against "circumstantial" character evidence, the prohibition in Federal Rule against the use of character to show conduct. Rules such as Rule 415 provide that in a civil action which a claim rests on a party's alleged conduct constituting a criminal sexual assault or child molestation, evidence of that party's commission of another offense or offenses of sexual assault or child molestation is relevant and admissible.

Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, pin? (1997).Evidence that helps tell a factual story in an intelligible way or that puts the evidence or the issues in the case in a meaningful or intelligible context is "relevant."