VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
1620:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
Are other crimes, wrongs, or acts are admissible to show a "criminal pattern"?
Add Comment
Contributed in 2008 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
Browse from To conserve time and resources
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 807 or a comparable State rule applies only if the the affected statement is evidence of...Karme v. Commissioner, 673 F.2d 1062, 1065 (9th Cir. 1982) (holding, in taxpayers' claim for deduction, that the tax court properly admitted into evidence the bank records and testimony under the residual hearsay....
in support of
The hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 807 or a comparable State rule applies only if the the affected statement is evidence of a material fact.vouch for authority for rule...
The marital testimony privilege does not extend to estranged or separated marital partners.Yaldo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 424 F.2d 501, 502-503 (6th Cir. 1970) (petitioner entered the United States on a student visa; he then married a US citizen before the expiration of his student visa; proceedings ensued to have his immigration status changed to permanent resident alien;...
in support of
The marital testimony privilege does not extend to estranged or separated marital partners.vouch for authority for rule...
A statement falls within the hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) or a comparable State rule for excited utterances, only...United States v. Hadley, 431 F.3d 484, 495-496 (6th Cir. 2005) (upholding trial court's admission of defendant wife's statements as excited utterances because "an ongoing domestic dispute that warranted two 911 calls....
in support of
A statement falls within the hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) or a comparable State rule for excited utterances, only if the declarant (the maker of the statement) was under the stress of the startling event or condition when he or she made the statement that relates to that startling event or condition.