Browse from 
VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
1626:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!1630!:false:-1:-1
Under some circumstances untruthfulness is admissible to impeach a witness.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2008 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
A party objecting to an offer of evidence need not state the ground of its objection if the ground of the objection is already apparent.Fed. R. Evid. 103(a)(1) (statement of the specific ground of the objection necessary "if the specific ground [of the objection] was not apparent from the context").
in support of
A party objecting to an offer of evidence need not state the ground of its objection if the ground of the objection is already apparent.vouch for authority for rule...
A statement falls within the hearsay exception provided by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) only if the statement is related to a startling event or...Fed. R. Evid. 803(2) ("A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.").
in support of
A statement falls within the hearsay exception provided by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) only if the statement is related to a startling event or condition.vouch for authority for rule...
There is a hearsay exception for reputation in a community, arising before the controversy, as to boundaries of or customs affecting lands in the...Fed. R. Evid. 803(20) ("Reputation in a community, arising before the controversy, as to boundaries of or customs affecting lands in the community, and reputation as to events of general history important to the community or State or nation in which located.").
in support of
There is a hearsay exception for reputation in a community, arising before the controversy, as to boundaries of or customs affecting lands in the community, and reputation as to events of general history important to the community or State or nation in which located.