A prior statement of a witness is exempt from the prohibition against hearsay evidence if the prior statement is consistent with the witness' testimony at the trial or hearing at which the prior statement is offered, the prior statement is offered to rebut a express or implied charge of recent fabrication or motive, and the witness who made the prior statement testifies and is subject to cross-examination at the trial or hearing at which the prior statement is offered.

United States v. Perlmuter, 693 F.2d 1290, 1294 (9th Cir. 1982) (reversing conviction for knowingly procuring naturalization contrary to law because the trial court erred in admitting Exhibit 4 [which indicated that....There is a hearsay exception for evidence of a final judgment, entered after a trial or upon a plea of guilty (but not upon a plea of nolo contendere), adjudging a person guilty of a crime punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year, to prove any fact essential to sustain the judgment, but not including, when offered by the Government in a criminal prosecution for purposes other than impeachment, judgments against persons other than the accused.

Fed. R. Evid. 401 ("'Relevant evidence' means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more....Evidence is relevant if it increases or decreases to any degree the probability of a fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action.

United States v. Console, 13 F.3d 641, 656-657 (3d Cir. 1993) (upholding trial court's admission of the Accident Book [prepared by a qualified witness who was familiar with the office record-keeping system and the various....The hearsay exception for "business records" recognized by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6) or a comparable State rule applies only if the record was made at or near the time of the events it records.