Browse from 
VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
1652:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!137276!137277!:false:-1:-1
Whether inferences based on inferences are permissible
Add Comment
Contributed in 2008 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
Law
»
Courts
»
Evidence
»
Admissibility of evidence
»
Relevance rules
»
Relevance and prejudice
»
Relevance
»
Circumstantial evidence
»
Inference on inference permissible?: Whether inferences based...
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Another act, wrong, or crime is admissible to show a motive for some alleged conduct on a particular occasion.Buckley v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 306, 319 (4th Cir. 2008) (vacating judgment and remanding for further proceedings in a retaliation claim in which the trial court excluded Segar litigation evidence, on ground that plaintiff "intended to utilize the Segar litigation evidence to demonstrate retaliatory animus,...
in support of
Another act, wrong, or crime is admissible to show a motive for some alleged conduct on a particular occasion.vouch for authority for rule...
Federal Rule of Evidence 410 or a comparable State rule bars the use of a nolo contendere plea (no contest plea) as evidence in any proceeding...Piassick v. United States, 253 F.2d 658, 661 (5th Cir. 1958) (reversing conviction for falsely reporting a tag number because the evidence of defendant's nolo contendere conviction of a prior offense was erroneously....
in support of
Federal Rule of Evidence 410 or a comparable State rule bars the use of a nolo contendere plea (no contest plea) as evidence in any proceeding against the defendant who entered this plea.complete authority for rule...
The exclusion of exculpatory evidence in a criminal trial does not violate the due constitutional right to present a defense if the grounds for...United States v. Scheffer, 523 U.S. 303, pin? (1998).
in support of
The exclusion of exculpatory evidence in a criminal trial does not violate the due constitutional right to present a defense if the grounds for exclusion are not arbitrary or disproportionate.