Although United States Supreme Court precedent establishes that in some circumstances a nonconstitutional privilege must yield to the federal constitutional rights of a criminal defendant, apart from the specific circumstances for which the Court has given an authoritative answer, it is unsettled and and it is unknown when such a privilege rule must yield to a federal constitutional right such as confrontation, due process, or the right to present a defense.

Contributed in 2008 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The admission of a statement made other than at the trial does not violate the right of confrontation guaranteed to a criminal defendant by the...
vouch for authority for rule...
Hearsay evidence is inadmissible.
vouch for authority for rule...
A criminal defendant may offer a pertinent trait of his or her character circumstantially -- to show the defendant's doing or non-doing of a...