VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
1716:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
Judicial review of administrative decisions made under the CAA.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2008 by Marcia Gelpe
Last edited in 2010 by Daniel Kaczor
Browse from Administrative procedures
Law
»
Environment, natural resources, energy
»
Environment
»
Clean Air Act (CAA) & air quality
»
Judicial review: Judicial review of administrative...
Narrow Down
»
»
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Existing sources are subject to regulation under a separate scheme set out for existing sources.Clean Air Act § 111(d), 42 U.S.C. § 7411(d).
in support of
Existing sources are subject to regulation under a separate scheme set out for existing sources.vouch for authority for rule...
It is sufficient to meet the traceability requirement for the plaintiff to show that the violation has a slight impact on the plaintiff's injury.Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 177 F. Supp. 2d 1011, 1019 (N.D. Cal. 2001).
in support of
It is sufficient to meet the traceability requirement for the plaintiff to show that the violation has a slight impact on the plaintiff's injury.vouch for authority for rule...
EPA must set an emission floor for each source category or subcategory that emits HAPs even if no technology is currently being used to control...Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA, 489 F.3d 1364, 1371 (D.C. Cir. 2007).
in support of
EPA must set an emission floor for each source category or subcategory that emits HAPs even if no technology is currently being used to control HAPs from that particular category or subcategory.