Whether another crime may be used as evidence for an otherwise permissible non-propensity "circumstantial" purpose (i.e., other than to shed light on a witness' credibility) if (i) there was no conviction for the other crime or (ii) the person who allegedly committed the other crime was acquitted of committing the other crime

Lexington Insurance Co.v . Western Pennsylvania Hospital, 423 F.3d 318, 330 (3d Cir. 2005) (holding, in plaintiff insurer's action against defendant insured for declaratory judgment, that even though HPL Create Sheet was admissible as it did not....Questions and inquiries are not assertions, thus, they cannot be hearsay.

United States v. Johns, 15 F.3d 740, 744 (8th Cir. 1994) (upholding trial court's exclusion of victim's sexual history because the accused failed (1) to raise an issue as to the source of semen or injury, and (2) to show prior instances of consensual sex between victim and himself).Rape shield laws frequently make it impermissible -- sometimes in trials of civil actions as well as in criminal trials -- to introduce evidence either to show that an alleged victim of sexual wrongdoing engaged in other sexual behavior or to show the alleged victim's sexual predisposition.

Fed. R. Evid. 803(16) ("Statements in a document in existence twenty years or more the authenticity of which is established.").Federal Rule of Evidence 803(16) and comparable State rules create a hearsay exception for statements in an authenticated document that is more than a certain number of years old, typically twenty years.