VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
199396:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
This is a cross reference. Click here to make the jump.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2010 by Peter Tillers
Browse from No
You've hit the end
Contribution Suggestions
complete authority for rule...
A chart, diagram, visual aid, or the like is not evidence.United States v. Nathan, 536 F.2d 988, 992 (2d Cir. 1976) (dictum: summary chart not evidence).
in support of
A chart, diagram, visual aid, or the like is not evidence.complete authority for rule...
There is no generally-accepted general definition of "evidence."Cf. Bismullah v. Gates, 514 F.3d 1291, 1304 n. 4 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (review sought of findings of Combatant Status Review Tribunal; Judge Randolph, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: "Under Defense Department regulations, 'Government Information' is 'reasonably available information in...
in support of
There is no generally-accepted general definition of "evidence."vouch for authority for rule...
Leading questions -- suggestive questions, questions that suggest the answer sought -- are generally impermissible during direct examination.Fed. R. Evid. 611(c) ("Leading questions should not be used on the direct examination of a witness except as may be necessary to develop the witness' testimony.").
in support of
Leading questions -- suggestive questions, questions that suggest the answer sought -- are generally impermissible during direct examination.