VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
199402:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
General characteristics of proof in American trials
Add Comment
Contributed in 2010 & last edited in 2010 by Peter Tillers
Browse from Antitrust (Coming!)
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Document must have been prepared in the normal course of business.United States v. Wills, 346 F.3d 476, 491 (4th Cir. 2003) (upholding trial court's admission into evidence of the records of Cingular Wireless as business records because "the information submitted by Radio Shack to....
in support of
Document must have been prepared in the normal course of business.vouch for authority for rule...
Under some circumstances untruthfulness is admissible to impeach a witness.United States v. Turning Bear, 357 F.3d 730, 733-734 (8th Cir. 2004) (conviction for aggravated sexual abuse of his son and daughter; accused challenged the trial court's exclusion of testimony from a foster care parent who saw the son on a daily basis for four to six months, and that in her opinion, the...
in support of
Under some circumstances untruthfulness is admissible to impeach a witness.complete authority for rule...
When considering whether some putatively scientific or expert evidence is sufficiently reliable to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of...Presley v. Lakewood Engineering and Mfg. Co., 553 F.3d 638, 643 (8th Cir. 2009) ("district court can weigh 'whether the expertise was developed for litigation or naturally flowed from the expert's research'").
in support of
When considering whether some putatively scientific or expert evidence is sufficiently reliable to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or a comparable State rule for the admissibility of scientific or expert evidence, the trial court may consider whether the expert or scientific evidence, principle, or method was developed by a party or its agent in anticipation of litigation.