VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
199406:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
Proof as a chronological and temporal process
Add Comment
Contributed in 2010 by Peter Tillers
Last edited in 2010 by David Gold
Browse from Deference to forum choice
Law
»
Courts
»
Evidence
»
The nature of proof
»
Proof as temporal process: Proof as a chronological...
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 807 or a parallel State rule applies only if admission of the affected statement in...Huff v. White Motor Corp, 609 F.2d 286, 294 (7th Cir. 1979) ( holding, in plaintiff wife's wrongful death action against defendant tractor-truck manufacturer, that the trial court erroneously excluded decedent's....
in support of
The hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 807 or a parallel State rule applies only if admission of the affected statement in evidence serves the interests of justice and the general purposes of the law of evidence.vouch for authority for rule...
A criminal defendant's criminal propensity to commit cannot be used to show that defendant committed the crime or crimes for which he or she is on...Fed. R. Evid. 404(a) ("Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is not admissible for the purpose of proving action in conformity therewith on a particular occasion").
in support of
A criminal defendant's criminal propensity to commit cannot be used to show that defendant committed the crime or crimes for which he or she is on trial.complete authority for rule...
Inferences on inferences are impermissibleRosenberg v. United States, 120 F. 935, 937 (10th Cir. 1941).
in support of
Inferences on inferences are impermissible