VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
199579:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
Discovery issues in antitrust litigation.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2010 by Paul Moore
Last edited in 2010 by Nicholas Diamand
Browse from Impeachment
Law
»
Commerce, labor, particular activities & industries
»
Antitrust (Coming!)
»
Antitrust litigation
»
Discovery: Discovery issues in antitrust...
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
complete authority for rule...
Vertical Price Minima are judged under the rule of reasonLeegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 577, pin? (2007) (overuling Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park and Sons, 220 U.S. 373 (1911), which had held that minimum resale price maintenance is unlawful per se).
in support of
Vertical Price Minima are judged under the rule of reasoncomplete authority for rule...
Vertical non-price restraints are judged under the rule of reason.Continental TV v. GTE Sylvania, 433 U.S. 36, pin? (1977) (overruling United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co., 388 U. S. 365, which had held that a manufacturer assigning its retailers exclusive territories was per se illegal).
in support of
Vertical non-price restraints are judged under the rule of reason.complete authority for rule...
Vertical price maxima are judged under the Rule of Reason.STATE OIL COMPANY, PETITIONER v. BARKAT U. KHAN and KHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC, 522 U.S. 3, pin? (1997) (overuling Albrech v. Herald Co., 390 U.S. 145 (1968), which had held that maximum resale price maintenance is unlawful per se)).
in support of
Vertical price maxima are judged under the Rule of Reason.